Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

PI

Progyny, Inc. (PGNY)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2024 revenue was $286.6M and diluted EPS $0.11; adjusted EPS $0.40 and adjusted EBITDA $46.5M. Revenue grew 2.0% YoY but came in below prior Q3 guidance ($290–$303M), while adjusted EPS was above guidance ($0.35–$0.38). Management revised full-year 2024 guidance lower, citing slower progression and fewer ART cycles per utilizer than historical patterns .
  • Utilization rates remained healthy (female 0.47%), but members consumed fewer stimulation-related ART cycles and took longer to progress through treatment; Q3 gross margin compressed to 20.7% on higher care management costs and mix dynamics .
  • Sales season produced 80+ new clients and ~1.1M new covered lives, and Progyny added a leading national and a regional health plan as preferred partners; 1.5M covered lives have adopted maternity/menopause programs for 2025 .
  • Cash flow remained strong ($44.5M from operations in Q3); the company repurchased 2.8M shares in Q3 and ~12.4M shares year-to-date, completing authorizations. FY24 revenue is now $1.135–$1.150B, adjusted EBITDA $189–$194M, adjusted EPS $1.54–$1.57 .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Expanded distribution via preferred partnerships with a leading national and a regional health plan; strong employer adoption for new women’s health services, with clients representing ~1.5M lives adopting maternity and/or menopause programs in 2025 .
  • Sales season momentum: 80+ new clients and ~1.1M new covered lives; retention ~99% with ~30% of clients expanding programs for 2025 (more smart cycles, Rx, and/or new programs), underscoring competitive positioning .
  • Adjusted EPS beat guidance ($0.40 vs $0.35–$0.38) and strong operating cash flow ($44.5M), enabling continued buybacks (2.8M shares in Q3; ~12.4M to date) .

Quote: “We’re extremely pleased with the advancement of our health plan strategy… and the reception for our newest services in maternity and menopause…” — CEO Pete Anevski .

What Went Wrong

  • Top-line and margin pressure from lower-than-expected ART cycles per utilizer and slower progression through treatment, resulting in revenue below Q3 guidance and a 160 bps YoY gross margin decline to 20.7% .
  • FY24 guidance cut (revenue, net income, adjusted EBITDA) reflecting ongoing variability in consumption despite steady utilization, and modest net reduction in covered lives at certain clients earlier in the year .
  • Higher tax expense and care management investments pressured GAAP EPS ($0.11 vs $0.16 LY); adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 16.2% (–160 bps YoY) .

Financial Results

MetricQ1 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024
Revenue ($USD Millions)$278.1 $304.1 $286.6
YoY Revenue Growth (%)~8% 8.8% 2.0%
Gross Margin (%)22.4% 22.5% 20.7%
Net Income ($USD Millions)$16.9 $16.5 $10.4
Diluted EPS ($)$0.17 $0.17 $0.11
Adjusted EPS ($)$0.39 $0.43 $0.40
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$50.3 $54.5 $46.5
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)18.1% 17.9% 16.2%

Segment Breakdown (Revenue)

Segment ($USD Millions)Q1 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024
Fertility Benefit Services$169.8 $193.6 $178.8
Pharmacy Benefit Services$108.3 $110.5 $107.9

KPIs

KPIQ1 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024
ART Cycles (count)~14,800 15,562 14,911
Female Utilization Rate (%)0.46% 0.47% 0.47%
Average Members (covered lives)~6,400,000 6,409,000 6,444,000
Clients (≥1,000 lives)451 (as of 3/31) 463 (as of 6/30) 468 (as of 9/30)

Q3 vs Guidance vs Estimates

ItemQ3 Guidance (Aug 6)Q3 ActualSPGI Consensus
Revenue ($USD Millions)$290–$303 $286.6 Unavailable (SPGI rate limit)*
Diluted EPS ($)$0.11–$0.14 $0.11 Unavailable (SPGI rate limit)*
Adjusted EPS ($)$0.35–$0.38 $0.40 Unavailable (SPGI rate limit)*
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$47.5–$51.0 $46.5 Unavailable (SPGI rate limit)*

*Values retrieved from S&P Global could not be fetched at time of execution due to rate limits.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Revenue ($USD Billions)FY 2024$1.165–$1.200 $1.135–$1.150 Lowered
Net Income ($USD Millions)FY 2024$55.4–$62.4 $49.9–$53.3 Lowered
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)FY 2024$199–$209 $189–$194 Lowered
Adjusted EPS ($)FY 2024$1.53–$1.61 $1.54–$1.57 Narrowed range
Revenue ($USD Millions)Q4 2024N/A$266.2–$281.2 New
Net Income ($USD Millions)Q4 2024N/A$6.1–$9.5 New
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)Q4 2024N/A$37.8–$42.8 New
Adjusted EPS ($)Q4 2024N/A$0.31–$0.35 New
Provision for Income Taxes ($USD Millions)Q4 2024N/A$2.66–$4.26 New
Other Income, net ($USD Millions)Q4 2024N/A$(4.624) New
Assumed Diluted Shares (Millions)Q4 2024N/A~91 New

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
Utilization vs ConsumptionQ1: female utilization dipped vs 2023 peaks; cohort behavior normal; Q2: utilization ~0.47% with lower ART cycles per utilizer vs historical ramp .Utilization healthy (0.47%); slower progression to treatment and fewer stimulation-related ART cycles per utilizer than long-term patterns .Variability persists; cautious outlook.
Health plan/channel partnershipsAdvancing new partnerships; preferred partner wins (Meritain/Aetna subsidiary); expanding with CVS, Evernorth, Vistica .Added leading national and regional health plans as preferred partners for 2025; partners also becoming clients .Expanding distribution.
Sales season and covered livesQ1: target ≥1.3M lives; pipeline healthy; early commitments pacing ahead . Q2: commitments pacing ahead of prior year; broad industry wins .~1.1M new lives; 80+ new clients; >530 clients expected in 2025 (~6.7M lives) .Solid new logos; slight skew to larger deals.
Women’s health programs (maternity/menopause)Early client interest; upsell pathways broaden beyond fertility .~1.5M lives adopting programs in 2025; 40% of new clients, ~20% of existing clients adopting .Strong adoption; limited 2025 revenue expected.
Regulatory/macro (Alabama IVF; elections)Q1: Alabama decision coincided with March activity dip; recovery seen in Q2; bipartisan support expected .Management not seeing direct election impact; no faith-based benefit demand observed; red/blue state differences moderated .Noise abating; monitoring continues.
Margin/cost structureQ2: gross margin +80 bps YoY; operating efficiencies; Rx growth moderated .Q3 gross margin –160 bps YoY from care management costs and ART cycle dynamics; moderated hiring for 2025 onboarding .Near-term pressure; disciplined cost control.
Capital returnsQ1/Q2: buybacks authorized and executed ($100M + $100M); ~6.8M shares repurchased by Q2 .Q3: 2.8M shares repurchased; ~12.4M total to date, completing authorizations .Ongoing returns; reduced diluted shares.

Management Commentary

  • “Members… took longer to progress through their treatment and… consumed fewer treatments overall, resulting in lower-than-expected revenue and profitability this quarter.” — CEO Pete Anevski .
  • “We’re extremely pleased with the advancement of our health plan strategy… and encouraged with the reception for our newest services in maternity and menopause…” — CEO Pete Anevski .
  • “Gross margin… decline due to investments in care management services as well as the impact of the unanticipated decline in cycles per utilizer.” — CFO Mark Livingston .
  • “We believe it’s prudent to assume yet another variance could occur and have contemplated the ranges accordingly.” — CFO Mark Livingston (on guidance philosophy) .

Q&A Highlights

  • Utilization visibility and drivers: Management tracks scheduled appointments and ART cycles per utilizer; PCAs focus on member support, not timing. The team ruled out coverage reductions and clinic backlogs as causes; consumption variability (e.g., freeze-all, egg freezing pacing) is the driver .
  • Margin outlook and hiring: Care management staffing for new launches and ART cycle dynamics drove gross margin compression; hiring will be moderated into 2025 given a previously disclosed large client loss .
  • Competitive landscape and retention: Continued strong win rates vs VC-backed peers and health plans; ~99% retention with only five losses (including one large loss previously disclosed) .
  • Potential business model adjustments: Management is exploring ways to mitigate utilization variability; does not support dollar-max benefits that lead to suboptimal care decisions .
  • Guidance philosophy: Incorporates more variability and less reliance on the latest datapoint after lessons in 2024; ranges widened when uncertainty is higher .

Estimates Context

  • SPGI/Wall Street consensus estimates for Q3 2024 and forward periods were unavailable at time of retrieval due to S&P Global rate limits; therefore, direct comparison to consensus cannot be provided in this report. Values would ordinarily be retrieved from S&P Global.
  • Implication: Given Q3 revenue missed prior guidance while adjusted EPS exceeded, and FY24 revenue/EBITDA guidance was lowered, consensus revenue and EBITDA likely require downward revisions, while adjusted EPS may be less negatively impacted due to share count reduction and non-GAAP adjustments .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Near-term: Expect continued variability in ART cycles per utilizer and cautious Q4 outlook; focus on margin discipline and cash generation as management moderates hiring and executes within revised ranges .
  • Sales/Distribution: Health plan partnerships and channel relationships expand go-to-market reach; strong 2025 adoption of maternity/menopause creates strategic optionality even if revenue contribution is initially modest .
  • Competitive Position: High retention and broad industry wins (80+ clients, ~1.1M lives) underscore leading market position despite a large client loss in 2025 .
  • Cash and Capital Returns: Robust operating cash flow supports continued shareholder returns; buybacks have reduced diluted shares, aiding adjusted EPS resilience .
  • Model Watch Items: Track ART cycles per utilizer trend in Q4; monitor gross margin progression and tax expense; watch client lives trajectory and Rx penetration (~94% in 2025) .
  • Medium-term Thesis: Diversification into broader women’s health, expanding partnerships, and employer demand should sustain growth; consumption variability appears episodic vs structural per management commentary .